Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 14:40:58 GMT 8
Than some might think. The most important thing is not where we work; The question is how the work is done and by whom. In a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, we analyzed results from multiple participants in multiple groups across a diverse sample and found that groups working remotely were just as effective as groups working in person. More specifically, we measured the collective intelligence of teams and their ability to work together effectively on a wide range of tasks and found little difference in the factors that explain the collective intelligence of face-to-face and remote teams. Email Updates About the Future of Work Monthly, research-based updates on what the future of work means for your workplace, teams and culture.
What is your email? Sign Up Privacy Policy We did find that in both cases, how the work was done and who was working on it were significant predictors of collective intelligence. For example, the greatest predictor of collective intelligence is the team's collaborative process. More specifically, two aspects of Job Function Email List how first, they figure out which member is best at different tasks and let that person take the lead; second, members coordinate their efforts in order to accomplish all the different tasks. Don't let things fall by the wayside.’ skills and covering all tasks is equally important for remote teams as for in-person teams, and that collectively intelligent teams are able to coordinate in these ways regardless of where they work. Furthermore.
We observed that who is doing the work has a significant impact on the collective intelligence of the team not only whether they possess task-relevant skills, but also on their social skills, especially their social perception. Groups whose members were more socially perceptive picked up on a variety of subtle nonverbal cues, and we observed that they were also able to coordinate more effectively in the ways we describe even while working remotely. Related Articles Artificial Intelligence on Mars: Smarter Governance Strategically Aligning with AI and Intelligence Operational Security of AI: Many leaders at Chevron.
What is your email? Sign Up Privacy Policy We did find that in both cases, how the work was done and who was working on it were significant predictors of collective intelligence. For example, the greatest predictor of collective intelligence is the team's collaborative process. More specifically, two aspects of Job Function Email List how first, they figure out which member is best at different tasks and let that person take the lead; second, members coordinate their efforts in order to accomplish all the different tasks. Don't let things fall by the wayside.’ skills and covering all tasks is equally important for remote teams as for in-person teams, and that collectively intelligent teams are able to coordinate in these ways regardless of where they work. Furthermore.
We observed that who is doing the work has a significant impact on the collective intelligence of the team not only whether they possess task-relevant skills, but also on their social skills, especially their social perception. Groups whose members were more socially perceptive picked up on a variety of subtle nonverbal cues, and we observed that they were also able to coordinate more effectively in the ways we describe even while working remotely. Related Articles Artificial Intelligence on Mars: Smarter Governance Strategically Aligning with AI and Intelligence Operational Security of AI: Many leaders at Chevron.